Skip to content

Add Data Mapper tutorial links #1904

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

vaibhav-if
Copy link
Contributor

@vaibhav-if vaibhav-if commented Oct 31, 2021

Pull request title

Pull request description

  • Will add tutorial links to Data Mapper pattern's readme.md

For detailed contributing instructions see https://github.com/iluwatar/java-design-patterns/wiki/01.-How-to-contribute

@vaibhav-if vaibhav-if changed the title Add Data Transfer Object tutorial links Add Data Mapper tutorial links Oct 31, 2021
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
No Duplication information No Duplication information

@ohbus ohbus self-assigned this Nov 4, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@ohbus ohbus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you so much for your contribution.

Please collate these changes into a Single PR as it achieves the same thing. We would want to keep the commit log in our master branch to a minimum.

Please do mention the list of Patterns in that PR of which you have added the Tutorial links.

Looking forward to your cooperation.

Thanks.

@vaibhav-if
Copy link
Contributor Author

Please refer to #1901 for the requested changes!

@vaibhav-if vaibhav-if closed this Nov 4, 2021
@iluwatar iluwatar added this to the 1.25.0 milestone Nov 10, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants